Available now live
InvoiceForge
Every company runs its own job board on its own applicant tracking system. InvoiceForge asks all of them at once and hands back one deduplicated, filtered list.
The problem it removes
The rules are public. Getting them right is the work.
EN 16931 defines one semantic model and two syntaxes, and a document is rejected for things like a country code in the wrong format or totals that do not reconcile to the cent. This turns that into a solved problem.
- Totals computed, not trusted. Line sums, the VAT breakdown per rate and the amount due are recomputed and written into the document to the cent.
- Violations you can act on. Each one carries its rule identifier and business term, so you can look it up in the norm rather than guess.
- It never claims more than it checks. Every response states which rules were checked, and `describe_coverage` lists both the coverage and the gaps.
- Reads what suppliers send. UBL and the CII payload inside Factur-X, with any missing field reported rather than invented.
Tools
Four tools, plus free usage.
| Tool | Credits | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| generate_invoice | 1 | Turn invoice data into a compliant UBL 2.1 document following the EN 16931 model, with totals and the VAT breakdown computed for you. Validated before it is returned. EN 16931, UBL 2.1, Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 profiles. |
| validate_invoice | 1 | Check invoice data against a documented subset of the EN 16931 rules and get each violation with its rule identifier. It accepts incomplete data on purpose, because that is what you want checked. 30 rule groups, listed in full by describe_coverage. |
| extract_invoice | 1 | Read an incoming UBL or CII invoice into structured JSON, listing any field the document did not contain rather than guessing it. UBL 2.1 and CII, the XML inside Factur-X. |
| describe_coverage | 0.2 | List exactly which rules are checked and what this server does not do, including transmission over Peppol. Our own coverage statement. |
Measured
100% of scenarios passed on the last run.
9 agent scenarios against the deployed server, failure cases included. p95 0.57s end to end, which includes the job boards themselves.
Pricing
Same credits, same balance.
Starter
$101,000 credits. Enough to verify 1,000 companies.
Growth
$455,000 credits. 10 percent off the Starter rate.
Scale
$8010,000 credits. 20 percent off the Starter rate.
Accounts and checkout open with the public launch. The server is live now and the docs show the exact call.
Where the data comes from
Only the official public job board APIs that Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby and Workable publish so employers can distribute their openings. No login, no anti-bot circumvention, no candidate data, and every result links to the employer's own apply page.
We do not touch LinkedIn, Indeed or any source behind a login. That line is in the spec and this product stays well inside it.